ol.upperalpha { list-style-type: upper-alpha !important; } ol.loweralpha { list-style-type: lower-alpha !important; } ol.lowerroman { list-style-type: lower-roman !important; } ol.listnone { list-style-type: decimal !important; } ol.nostyle { list-style-type: none !important; } ul.discbullet { list-style-type: disc !important; } .bg-primary { background-color: #FFFFFF !important;} .text-white {color: #000000 !important;}
Print Friendly and PDF

9.60 – Administrative Reviews

Policy Details

Responsible Executive: President
Responsible Administrator: Provost and Chief Academic Officer
Scope: NMSU System
Last Updated: 05/13/2016

Each dean or community college executive officer is responsible for preparing, scheduling, delivering and retaining appropriate administrative reviews of associate deans, department heads, directors and their equivalent. In addition to annual performance evaluations, administrative reviews are scheduled to occur every few years to determine an incumbent’s performance as an administrator. Administrative reviews are often coordinated by a third party (such as NMSU’s Institutional Research) and may include written evaluation by both internal and external constituents.

Related

Cross-Reference:

Revision History:

2017 Recompilation, formerly Rule 5.06